June 16, 2020
News
Privacy Impact Assessment in the age of New Normal
May 21, 2020
One of the main reasons attributed to the relative success of most East Asian democracies’ strategies in handling the COVID-19 pandemic is the widespread adoption of the government-backed COVID-19 apps.
The Death of the Authors: The May 5th Writers' Strike (Virtual) in China
May 18, 2020
For we, which now behold these present days, Have eyes to wonder, but lack tongues to praise. ----William Shakespeare When in the Chronicle of Wasted Time On May 4th, when
Entries
Salman Shahid v. Federation of Pakistan
Islamabad High Court
In February 2017, the petitioner filed a petition in the Islamabad High Court praying that the Court take action into rampant blasphemy online by bloggers. On February 27, 2017, the
Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA), 2016
Safe Harbour Provision: The Act stipulates that no service providers would be longer liable for civil or criminal violations committed by their users, unless there is evidence that they had
Citizens Protection (Against Online Harm) Rules, 2020
Update (March 2020) : The Rules remain on the statute books however the Pakistani authorities have now pledged to review the regulations and undertake an ‘extensive and broad-based consultation process
My Space Inc. vs Super Cassettes Industries Ltd.
Delhi High Court
In a progressive judgment, the Delhi High Court held on December 23, 2016, that MySpace, a social networking platform was liable to take down copyright infringed content within 36 hours
Lifestyle Equities C.V. and Ors. v. Amazon Sellers Service Private Limited & Anr.
Delhi High Court
The manufacturer of goods using the trademark/brand Beverly Hills Polo Club filed an application for an injunction in the Delhi High Court to take down URLs of sellers marketing counterfeit
Christian Louboutin SAS v. Nakul Bajaj and Ors.
Delhi High Court
On November 2, 2018, the Delhi High Court laid down detailed conditions for an e-commerce intermediary needed to meet in order to claim safe harbour protection under Section 79 of
In Re: In the matter of incidence of gang rape in a boarding school
Uttarakhand High Court
On September 27, 2018, the High Court of Uttarakhand directed Internet Service Providers to block the publication/transmission of all obscene material in electronic form, including child pornography under Rule 3(2)(b,c)
Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. v. 1MG Technologies Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
Delhi High Court
On July 8, 2019, the Delhi High Court passed an order that had major implications for online intermediaries who served as e-commerce platforms. The Court held that e-commerce platforms were
Google India Private Ltd v. M/s. Visakha Industries
Supreme Court of India
Note: This case originated in July 2008 and is based on the Intermediary Liability framework prior to the 2008 Amendment to the Information Technology Act, 2000. The 2008 Amendment had
Swami Ramdev & Anr. v. Facebook, Inc. & Ors.
Delhi High Court
On October 23, 2019, the Delhi High Court issued an injunction against Facebook, Google, YouTube and Twitter (Defendants) and other online intermediaries, directing them to globally take down a list
draft Information Technology [Intermediaries Guidelines (Amendment) Rules] 2018
Proposed rules to amend the Information Technology (Intermediaries guidelines) Rules, 2011
In December 2018, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology released the Intermediary Liability Guidelines (Amendment) Rules, which would significantly alter the intermediary liability regime in India. The Rules for
Federal Law No. 426-FZ, On Amending the Law of the Russian Federation “On the Mass Media” and the Federal Law “On Information, Information Technologies and Protection of Information”, December 2, 2019
aka “Foreign agents” Law
In early December 2019, Vladimir Putin signed a law that will allow Russia to declare journalists and bloggers as “foreign agents” in a move critics say will allow the Kremlin
Federal Law No. 30-FZ “On Amendments to the Federal Law ‘On Information, Information Technologies and Information Protection’” March 18, 2019
aka “Disrespect for the authorities” Law
It outlaws “ the spreading of information which shows blatant disrespect for society, the government, official state symbols of the Russian Federation, the Constitution of the Russian Federation or authorities
Juzgado Nacional de Primera Instancia en lo Civil [First Instance Court], Denegri, Natalia Ruth c/Google Inc. s/derechos personalísimos
Expte. Nº 50.016/2016
A civil judge partially admitted the claim of the model and tv host Natalia Denegri and ordered Google to "deindex" all the images and videos related to the widely known
Corte Suprema [Supreme Court], Páquez, José c/Google Inc. s/medidas precautorias
CIV 23410/2014/3/RH2
The Supreme Court of Justice overturned a judgment of the Civil Court of Appeals, which ordered Google to remove a search suggestion that involved the General Secretary of a public
Federal Law No. 31-FZ, On Amending the Article 15.3 of the Federal Law “On Information, Information Technologies, and Information Protection”, March 18, 2019
aka "Fake news Law”
Amendments to the Federal Law of 27 July 2006 No. 149-FZ “On information, information technologies and the protection of information”, under which the publication of fake news and information showing
Federal Law No. 425-FZ, On Amending the Article 4 of the Federal Law “On Consumer Rights Protection”, December 2, 2019
aka "Law on pre-installation with Russian software” or “Law against Google”
The law banning the sale of certain devices that are not pre-installed with Russian software. The law will come into force in July 2020 and cover smartphones, computers and smart